NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Iris Plus 640

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs Intel Iris Plus 640 0 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points

681% significantly better overall score

287 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS

43 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

9 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS

26 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

30 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

7 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

21 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

2 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the Iris Plus 640? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points

480% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

6601 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points

425% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

6827 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points

500% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

6639 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points

442% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

6920 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz

395% significantly higher core clock speed

300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1665 MHz

51% significantly higher boost clock speed

1100 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

700% significantly more memory

0.5 GiB

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

15 W

400% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s

707% significantly higher pixel rate

6.6 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s

76% significantly higher texture rate

52.8 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

133% significantly more shading units

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

16% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

433% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586

385th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2017 January

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.4

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Plus 640 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 GPU is faster than the Iris Plus 640 in gaming.

The GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 0.5 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Iris Plus 640 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 is better than the Iris Plus 640.