NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel HD 620

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs Intel HD 620, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points

1243% significantly better overall score

167 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS

48 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

4 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS

28 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

2 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

34 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

3 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

21 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the HD 620? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

3627 points

976% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

337 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points

752% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

4496 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points

688% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

4551 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points

852% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

4185 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points

695% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

4718 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz

395% significantly higher core clock speed

300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1665 MHz

66% significantly higher boost clock speed

1000 MHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

15 W

400% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s

1676% significantly higher pixel rate

3 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s

288% significantly higher texture rate

24 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

366% significantly more shading units

192

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

133% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

966% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586

455th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2016 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 vs HD 620 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 GPU is faster than the HD 620 in gaming.

The GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the HD 620 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 at 75 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 is faster than the HD 620.