NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel HD 4400

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs Intel HD 4400 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points

2932% significantly better overall score

74 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS

50 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

2 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS

29 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

1 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

35 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

1 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

22 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the HD 4400? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points

1566% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

2299 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points

1496% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

2249 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points

1763% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

2138 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points

1643% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

2153 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz

642% significantly higher core clock speed

200 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1665 MHz

75% significantly higher boost clock speed

950 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

140% significantly more memory

1.66 GiB

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

20 W

274% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s

2704% significantly higher pixel rate

1.9 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s

390% significantly higher texture rate

19 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

459% significantly more shading units

160

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

180% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

1500% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586

521st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.2

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.3

GeForce GTX 1650 vs HD 4400 comparison

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 graphics card is better than the HD 4400 in our tests.

The GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

As stated by the manufacturer, the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 1.66 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the HD 4400 has a significantly lower TDP at 20 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 is faster than the HD 4400.