NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points

296% significantly better overall score

566 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS

35 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

18 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS

21 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

9 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

27 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

9 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

15 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

8 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the GeForce MX330? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

445.31 points

511% significantly higher Blender score

72.87 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

40258 points

306% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

9906 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points

265% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

10474 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points

258% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

10022 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points

277% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

10544 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points

315% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

9041 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz

1531 MHz

3% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1665 MHz

4% slightly higher boost clock speed

1594 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128.1 GB/s

128% significantly higher memory bandwidth

56.06 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

10 W

650% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s

108% significantly higher pixel rate

25.5 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s

143% significantly higher texture rate

38.26 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

133% significantly more shading units

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

133% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586

317th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2020 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX330 comparison

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1650 beats the GeForce MX330 in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the GeForce MX330 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. Despite this, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the GeForce MX330 has a significantly lower TDP at 10 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1650 over the GeForce MX330.