NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points

953% significantly better overall score

213 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS

48 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

4 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS

27 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

33 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

3 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

20 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the GeForce MX110? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

445.31 points

1018% significantly higher Blender score

39.82 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

40258 points

770% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

4625 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points

728% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

4623 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points

768% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

4132 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points

813% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

4362 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points

888% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

3799 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz

51% significantly higher core clock speed

978 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1665 MHz

65% significantly higher boost clock speed

1006 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128.1 GB/s

219% significantly higher memory bandwidth

40.1 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

30 W

150% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s

562% significantly higher pixel rate

8.05 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s

286% significantly higher texture rate

24.14 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

133% significantly more shading units

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

133% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

300% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586

425th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2017 November

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX110 benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1650 beats the GeForce MX110 in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the GeForce MX110 has a significantly lower TDP at 30 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 at 75 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 is better than the GeForce MX110.