NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points
278% significantly better overall score
593 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS
40 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
13 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS
20 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
11 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS
27 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
10 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS
14 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
9 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the GeForce GTX 960M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

3627 points
194% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
1232 points
Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

445.31 points
219% significantly higher Blender score
139.59 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

40258 points
240% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
11818 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points
212% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
12257 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points
239% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
10582 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points
244% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
11578 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points
293% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
9535 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz
35% slightly higher core clock speed
1097 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1665 MHz
41% slightly higher boost clock speed
1176 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
Identical
4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
Identical
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128.1 GB/s
59% significantly higher memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W
65 W
15% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s
183% significantly higher pixel rate
18.82 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s
98% significantly higher texture rate
47.04 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.98 TFLOPS
98% significantly better floating point performance
1.50 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896
40% slightly more shading units
640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

56
40% slightly more texture mapping units
40

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
100% significantly more render output processors
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586
310th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April
2015 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 960M benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 GPU is faster than the GeForce GTX 960M in gaming.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

As stated by the manufacturer, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 960M has a slightly lower TDP at 65 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 at 75 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 is better than the GeForce GTX 960M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons