NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro W7100

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs AMD FirePro W7100 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

AMD FirePro W7100

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 249.99

$ 189.96

$ 60.03 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points

95% significantly better overall score

1150 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS

27 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

26 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS

13 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

17 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

15 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

22 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

9 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the FirePro W7100? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points

48% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

25868 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points

41% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

25403 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points

64% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

24202 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points

36% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

27600 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz

61% significantly higher core clock speed

920 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

8 GiB

100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128.1 GB/s

160 GB/s

24% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

100% significantly lower TDP

150 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s

80% significantly higher pixel rate

29.44 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s

103 Gigatexels/s

10% slightly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.98 TFLOPS

3.3 TFLOPS

10% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

1792

100% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586

255th of 586

Family

The product line

FirePro

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2014 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.4

GeForce GTX 1650 vs FirePro W7100 benchmarks

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 graphics card is better than the FirePro W7100 in our tests.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the FirePro W7100 has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the FirePro W7100 at 150 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 is better than the FirePro W7100.