NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc A370M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs Intel Arc A370M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points

89% significantly better overall score

1187 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS

19 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

33 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS

11 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

19 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

17 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

19 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

11 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

12 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the Arc A370M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

3627 points

5% slightly higher 3DMark Graphics score

3430 points

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

445.31 points

35% slightly higher Blender score

328.16 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points

33% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

29812 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points

30% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

28700 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz

395% significantly higher core clock speed

300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1665 MHz

7% slightly higher boost clock speed

1550 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128.1 GB/s

14% slightly higher memory bandwidth

112 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

35 W

114% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s

7% slightly higher pixel rate

49.6 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s

99.2 Gigatexels/s

6% slightly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.98 TFLOPS

3.17 TFLOPS

6% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

1024

14% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

14% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586

251st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2022 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Arc A370M benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1650 beats the Arc A370M in gaming performance.

The GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Arc A370M has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 at 75 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1650 over the Arc A370M.