NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 6 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2299 points

14% slightly better overall score

2012 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

52 FPS

Identical

52 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

31 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

30 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

7 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

30 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

4 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

19 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and the Quadro RTX 3000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

487.58 points

1534.25 points

214% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

48337 points

70456 points

45% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

43645 points

61102 points

39% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

38972 points

54040 points

38% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

44811 points

62696 points

39% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

40263 points

58257 points

44% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1350 MHz

42% much higher core clock speed

945 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

6 GiB

49% significantly more memory

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

55 W

45% significantly lower TDP

80 W

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

190th of 586

208th of 586

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Quadro RTX 3000 benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti GPU is faster than the Quadro RTX 3000 in gaming.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has a much higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly more memory with 6 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has a significantly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the Quadro RTX 3000 at 80 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti over the Quadro RTX 3000.