NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2299 points
2911 points
26% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

52 FPS
56 FPS
5 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

31 FPS
47 FPS
16 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS
39 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS
36 FPS
13 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and the Quadro P4200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

487.58 points
511.91 points
4% slightly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

48337 points
28% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
37676 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

43645 points
14% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
38169 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

44811 points
13% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
39489 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

40263 points
48559 points
20% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1350 MHz
10% slightly higher core clock speed
1227 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
8 GiB
100% significantly more memory

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

55 W
81% significantly lower TDP
100 W

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

190th of 586
159th of 586

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Quadro P4200 benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti beats the Quadro P4200 in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro P4200 has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has a significantly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the Quadro P4200 at 100 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is better than the Quadro P4200.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons