NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2299 points
239% significantly better overall score
677 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

52 FPS
33 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
19 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

31 FPS
19 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
13 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS
25 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
13 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS
13 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
11 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and the Quadro M2200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

487.58 points
219% significantly higher Blender score
152.71 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

48337 points
277% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
12812 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

43645 points
165% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
16429 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

38972 points
150% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
15588 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

44811 points
172% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
16429 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

40263 points
169% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
14964 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1350 MHz
31% slightly higher core clock speed
1025 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
Identical
4 GiB

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

55 W
Identical
55 W

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

190th of 586
295th of 586

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Quadro M2200 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti GPU is faster than the Quadro M2200 in gaming.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, both the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and the Quadro M2200 have an identical TDP. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is faster than the Quadro M2200.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons