NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2299 points

230% significantly better overall score

695 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

52 FPS

39 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

13 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

31 FPS

21 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

11 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

27 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

10 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

10 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and the Quadro K2200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

487.58 points

287% significantly higher Blender score

125.93 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

48337 points

318% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

11549 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

43645 points

263% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

12020 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

38972 points

246% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

11238 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

44811 points

291% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

11456 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

40263 points

298% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

10094 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1350 MHz

35% slightly higher core clock speed

1000 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

55 W

23% slightly lower TDP

68 W

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

190th of 586

291st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Quadro K2200 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti GPU is faster than the Quadro K2200 in gaming.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

As stated by the manufacturer, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has a slightly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the Quadro K2200 at 68 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is faster than the Quadro K2200.