NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 380

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 380 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2207 points
72% significantly better overall score
1280 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

47 FPS
18 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
29 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

29 FPS
11 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
19 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

35 FPS
9 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
26 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

22 FPS
12 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
10 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and the Radeon R9 380? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

3132 points
11% slightly higher 3DMark Graphics score
2801 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

40474 points
35% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
29877 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

36968 points
9% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
33763 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39947 points
41% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
28196 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

38942 points
15% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
33667 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1035 MHz
6% slightly higher core clock speed
970 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1200 MHz
23% slightly higher boost clock speed
970 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
Identical
4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
256 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

160 GB/s
3900% significantly higher memory bandwidth
4 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W
442% significantly lower TDP
190 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

38.4 Gigapixels/s
23% slightly higher pixel rate
31.04 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

76.8 Gigatexels/s
108.6 Gigatexels/s
41% slightly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.46 TFLOPS
3.48 TFLOPS
41% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024
1792
75% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

64
112
75% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
Identical
32

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

195th of 586
245th of 586

Family

The product line

-
Radeon R9 300 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 April
2015 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 380 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GPU is faster than the Radeon R9 380 in gaming.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the Radeon R9 380 at 190 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is better than the Radeon R9 380.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons