NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2207 points
1% slightly better overall score
2170 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

47 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate
47 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

29 FPS
30 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

35 FPS
47 FPS
12 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

22 FPS
5 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
16 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and the Radeon Pro Duo? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

40474 points
50232 points
24% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

36968 points
61450 points
66% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39947 points
55493 points
38% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

38942 points
42706 points
9% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
256 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

160 GB/s
512 GB/s
220% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W
900% significantly lower TDP
350 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

38.4 Gigapixels/s
64 Gigapixels/s
66% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

76.8 Gigatexels/s
256 Gigatexels/s
233% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.46 TFLOPS
11.5 TFLOPS
367% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024
4096
300% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

64
256
300% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
64
100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

195th of 586
196th of 586

Family

The product line

-
Radeon PRO

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 April
2017 April

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6
HBM

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro Duo specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GPU is faster than the Radeon Pro Duo in gaming.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the Radeon Pro Duo at 350 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q over the Radeon Pro Duo.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons