NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 6 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3115 points

3792 points

21% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

73 FPS

82 FPS

9 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

43 FPS

52 FPS

9 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

52 FPS

58 FPS

7 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

32 FPS

39 FPS

7 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

556.14 points

1340.13 points

140% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

57126 points

64172 points

12% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

53834 points

68305 points

26% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

49211 points

50239 points

2% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

56613 points

68305 points

20% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

54168 points

7% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

50377 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1530 MHz

155% significantly higher core clock speed

600 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1725 MHz

41% slightly higher boost clock speed

1215 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

6 GiB

49% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

192 Bit

49% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

192 GB/s

288 GB/s

49% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

100 W

60 W

66% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

55.2 Gigapixels/s

77.76 Gigapixels/s

40% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

138 Gigatexels/s

145.8 Gigatexels/s

5% slightly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

4.42 TFLOPS

4.67 TFLOPS

5% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1280

1920

49% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

120

49% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

152nd of 586

128th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 November

2019 May

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q benchmarks

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER graphics card is better than the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q in our tests.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER also has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q has significantly more memory with 6 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q has a significantly lower TDP at 60 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER at 100 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER over the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q.