NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 248.82
$ 134.75
$ 114.07 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3115 points
148% significantly better overall score
1252 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

73 FPS
46 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
27 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

43 FPS
24 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
19 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

52 FPS
35 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
17 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

32 FPS
16 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
15 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and the Quadro M4000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

4690 points
103% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
2302 points
Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

556.14 points
150% significantly higher Blender score
221.61 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

57126 points
243% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
16648 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

53834 points
193% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
18372 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

49211 points
134% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
20969 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

56613 points
183% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
20001 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

54168 points
127% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
23838 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1530 MHz
91% significantly higher core clock speed
800 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
8 GiB
100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
256 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

192 GB/s
192.3 GB/s
0.16% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

100 W
20% slightly lower TDP
120 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

55.2 Gigapixels/s
11% slightly higher pixel rate
49.47 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

138 Gigatexels/s
71% significantly higher texture rate
80.39 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

4.42 TFLOPS
71% significantly better floating point performance
2.57 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1280
1664
30% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

80
104
30% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
64
100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

152nd of 586
247th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 November
2015 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.4

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Quadro M4000 comparison

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER graphics card is better than the Quadro M4000 in our tests.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro M4000 has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has a slightly lower TDP at 100 W when compared to the Quadro M4000 at 120 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER over the Quadro M4000.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons