NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Intel Arc A380

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4 GB vs Intel Arc A380, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Intel Arc A380

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 248.82

$ 109.99

$ 138.83 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3115 points

2% slightly better overall score

3050 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

73 FPS

8 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

65 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

43 FPS

47 FPS

4 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

52 FPS

4 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

47 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

32 FPS

2 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

29 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and the Arc A380? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

4690 points

481% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

806 points

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

556.14 points

20% slightly higher Blender score

461.06 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

56613 points

47% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

38350 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

54168 points

47% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

36712 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1530 MHz

409% significantly higher core clock speed

300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1725 MHz

2000 MHz

15% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

33% slightly larger memory bus width

96 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

192 GB/s

3% slightly higher memory bandwidth

186 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

100 W

75 W

33% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

55.2 Gigapixels/s

64 Gigapixels/s

15% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

138 Gigatexels/s

7% slightly higher texture rate

128 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

4.42 TFLOPS

7% slightly better floating point performance

4.10 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1280

25% slightly more shading units

1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

25% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

152nd of 586

153rd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 November

2022 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Arc A380 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GPU is faster than the Arc A380 in gaming.

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. Despite this, the Arc A380 has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the Arc A380 has a slightly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER at 100 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is better than the Arc A380.