NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs NVIDIA T400 4GB

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q 4 GB vs NVIDIA T400 4GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1966 points

132% significantly better overall score

844 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

44 FPS

22 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

22 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

27 FPS

16 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

11 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

32 FPS

17 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

14 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

20 FPS

12 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

8 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and the T400 4GB? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

379.89 points

118% significantly higher Blender score

174.01 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

37945 points

132% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

16323 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

36447 points

121% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

16489 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

36740 points

113% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

17184 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

34464 points

112% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

16244 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1020 MHz

142% significantly higher core clock speed

420 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1125 MHz

1425 MHz

26% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

160 GB/s

100% significantly higher memory bandwidth

80 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W

30 W

16% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

36 Gigapixels/s

57% significantly higher pixel rate

22.8 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

72 Gigatexels/s

110% significantly higher texture rate

34.2 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

166% significantly more shading units

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

166% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

211th of 586

273rd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2021 May

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs T400 4GB comparison

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q graphics card is better than the T400 4GB in our tests.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. Despite this, the T400 4GB has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the T400 4GB has a slightly lower TDP at 30 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q at 35 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q over the T400 4GB.