NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 6 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1966 points
2012 points
2% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

44 FPS
52 FPS
8 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

27 FPS
30 FPS
3 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

32 FPS
2 FPS slightly higher City frame rate
30 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

20 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate
19 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and the Quadro RTX 3000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

379.89 points
1534.25 points
303% significantly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

37945 points
70456 points
85% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

36447 points
61102 points
67% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

32737 points
54040 points
65% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

36740 points
62696 points
70% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

34464 points
58257 points
69% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1020 MHz
7% slightly higher core clock speed
945 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
6 GiB
49% significantly more memory

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W
128% significantly lower TDP
80 W

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

211th of 586
208th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April
-

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6
-

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Quadro RTX 3000 specs and performance

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q graphics card is better than the Quadro RTX 3000 in our tests.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly more memory with 6 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the Quadro RTX 3000 at 80 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q over the Quadro RTX 3000.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons