NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1966 points

114% significantly better overall score

918 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

44 FPS

23 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

21 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

27 FPS

13 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

14 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

32 FPS

17 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

14 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

20 FPS

9 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

11 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and the GeForce MX350? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

2920 points

137% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

1229 points

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

379.89 points

308% significantly higher Blender score

92.96 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

37945 points

201% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

12572 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

36447 points

162% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

13872 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

32737 points

135% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

13882 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

36740 points

169% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

13618 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

34464 points

159% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

13257 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1020 MHz

36% slightly higher core clock speed

747 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1125 MHz

20% slightly higher boost clock speed

937 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

160 GB/s

185% significantly higher memory bandwidth

56.06 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W

20 W

75% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

36 Gigapixels/s

140% significantly higher pixel rate

14.99 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

72 Gigatexels/s

140% significantly higher texture rate

29.98 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.30 TFLOPS

22% slightly better floating point performance

1.88 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

60% significantly more shading units

640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

210th of 586

269th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2020 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs GeForce MX350 comparison

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q beats the GeForce MX350 in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the GeForce MX350 has a significantly lower TDP at 20 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q at 35 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is better than the GeForce MX350.