NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W7100

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q 4 GB vs AMD FirePro W7100 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1966 points

70% significantly better overall score

1150 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

44 FPS

18 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

26 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

27 FPS

10 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

17 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

32 FPS

10 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

22 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

20 FPS

11 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

9 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and the FirePro W7100? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

36447 points

40% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

25868 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

32737 points

28% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

25403 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

36740 points

51% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

24202 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

34464 points

24% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

27600 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1020 MHz

10% slightly higher core clock speed

920 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

8 GiB

100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

160 GB/s

Identical

160 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W

328% significantly lower TDP

150 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

36 Gigapixels/s

22% slightly higher pixel rate

29.44 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

72 Gigatexels/s

103 Gigatexels/s

43% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.30 TFLOPS

3.3 TFLOPS

43% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

1792

75% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112

75% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

211th of 586

255th of 586

Family

The product line

FirePro

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2014 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.4

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs FirePro W7100 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q GPU is faster than the FirePro W7100 in gaming.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

As stated by the manufacturer, the FirePro W7100 has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the FirePro W7100 at 150 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is better than the FirePro W7100.