NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 289.00

$ 170.10

$ 118.90 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2058 points

2513 points

22% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

42 FPS

62 FPS

20 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

33 FPS

36 FPS

2 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

27 FPS

41 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

29 FPS

31 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB and the Quadro K5200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

284.61 points

1% slightly higher Blender score

281.16 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

31922 points

132% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

13735 points

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

13527 points

55% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

8704 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

33958 points

111% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

16029 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

33939 points

89% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

17881 points

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

13527 points

55% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

8704 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

33375 points

74% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

19104 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

32433 points

60% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

20167 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1506 MHz

131% significantly higher core clock speed

650 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1708 MHz

121% significantly higher boost clock speed

771 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

256 Bit

33% slightly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

192.2 GB/s

192.3 GB/s

0.05% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W

25% slightly lower TDP

150 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

81.98 Gigapixels/s

121% significantly higher pixel rate

37.01 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

123 Gigatexels/s

148 Gigatexels/s

20% slightly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

3.94 TFLOPS

10% slightly better floating point performance

3.55 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1152

2304

100% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

192

166% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

206th of 586

176th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 August

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs Quadro K5200 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB GPU is faster than the Quadro K5200 in gaming.

The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has a slightly lower TDP at 120 W when compared to the Quadro K5200 at 150 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB over the Quadro K5200.