NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A2000, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 206.47
$ 318.49 significantly less expensive
$ 524.96

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1456 points
3755 points
157% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

31 FPS
96 FPS
65 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

21 FPS
45 FPS
24 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

22 FPS
64 FPS
42 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

17 FPS
35 FPS
18 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and the RTX A2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

2341 points
73% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
1346 points
Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

215.07 points
1954.21 points
808% significantly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

20616 points
84002 points
307% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

22192 points
76373 points
244% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

21230 points
58378 points
174% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

21530 points
73300 points
240% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

20196 points
69543 points
244% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1290 MHz
129% significantly higher core clock speed
562 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1392 MHz
16% slightly higher boost clock speed
1200 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
192 Bit
49% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

112.1 GB/s
288 GB/s
156% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W
70 W
7% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

44.54 Gigapixels/s
57.6 Gigapixels/s
29% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

66.82 Gigatexels/s
124.8 Gigatexels/s
86% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.14 TFLOPS
7.99 TFLOPS
273% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

768
3328
333% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

48
104
116% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
48
49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

237th of 586
129th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 October
2021 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.6

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs RTX A2000 comparison

For gaming, the RTX A2000 graphics card is better than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in our tests.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti also has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the RTX A2000 has a slightly lower TDP at 70 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the RTX A2000 is better than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons