NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 206.47
$ 130.23 significantly less expensive
$ 336.70

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1456 points
4933 points
238% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

31 FPS
114 FPS
83 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

21 FPS
65 FPS
44 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

22 FPS
78 FPS
56 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

17 FPS
49 FPS
32 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and the Quadro RTX 4000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

2341 points
7843 points
235% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

215.07 points
2173.35 points
910% significantly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

20616 points
94250 points
357% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

22192 points
85184 points
283% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

21230 points
66795 points
214% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

21530 points
84977 points
294% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

20196 points
79052 points
291% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1290 MHz
28% slightly higher core clock speed
1005 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1392 MHz
1545 MHz
10% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
8 GiB
100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
256 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

112.1 GB/s
416 GB/s
271% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W
113% significantly lower TDP
160 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

44.54 Gigapixels/s
98.88 Gigapixels/s
122% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

66.82 Gigatexels/s
222.5 Gigatexels/s
232% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.14 TFLOPS
7.12 TFLOPS
232% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

768
2304
200% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

48
144
200% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
64
100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

237th of 586
103rd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 October
2018 November

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.6

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro RTX 4000 benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro RTX 4000 GPU is faster than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in gaming.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. Despite this, the Quadro RTX 4000 has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro RTX 4000 has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Quadro RTX 4000 at 160 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro RTX 4000 is faster than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons