NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 206.47

$ 170.10

$ 36.37 slightly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1456 points

2513 points

72% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

31 FPS

62 FPS

30 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

21 FPS

36 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

22 FPS

41 FPS

19 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

17 FPS

31 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and the Quadro K5200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

215.07 points

281.16 points

30% slightly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

20616 points

50% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

13735 points

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

7834 points

8704 points

11% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

22192 points

38% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

16029 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

21230 points

18% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

17881 points

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

7834 points

8704 points

11% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

21530 points

12% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

19104 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

20196 points

0.14% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

20167 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1290 MHz

98% significantly higher core clock speed

650 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1392 MHz

80% significantly higher boost clock speed

771 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

8 GiB

100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

112.1 GB/s

192.3 GB/s

71% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

100% significantly lower TDP

150 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

44.54 Gigapixels/s

20% slightly higher pixel rate

37.01 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

66.82 Gigatexels/s

148 Gigatexels/s

121% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.14 TFLOPS

3.55 TFLOPS

66% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

768

2304

200% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

192

300% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

237th of 586

176th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 October

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro K5200 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro K5200 GPU is faster than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in gaming.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro K5200 has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Quadro K5200 at 150 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro K5200 is faster than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.