NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

213 points

278 points

30% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

4 FPS

6 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS

Identical

3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

3 FPS

4 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

Identical

3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce 920MX and the Quadro K3100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

47.80 points

84.13 points

76% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

4274 points

3% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

4121 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4210 points

19% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

3517 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3723 points

4645 points

24% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4072 points

6238 points

53% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3591 points

5% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

3389 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

965 MHz

41% slightly higher core clock speed

680 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

64 Bit

256 Bit

300% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

14.4 GB/s

102.4 GB/s

611% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

16 W

368% significantly lower TDP

75 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

7.94 Gigapixels/s

11.3 Gigapixels/s

42% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

23.83 Gigatexels/s

45.18 Gigatexels/s

89% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

256

768

200% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

166% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

300% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

418th of 586

390th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 March

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce 920MX vs Quadro K3100M specs and performance

For gaming, the Quadro K3100M graphics card is better than the GeForce 920MX in our tests.

Our database shows that the GeForce 920MX has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

In addition, the GeForce 920MX has a significantly lower TDP at 16 W when compared to the Quadro K3100M at 75 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro K3100M is better than the GeForce 920MX.