NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

Compare NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

213 points

918 points

330% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

4 FPS

21 FPS

16 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS

14 FPS

11 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

3 FPS

14 FPS

12 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

11 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce 920MX and the GeForce MX350? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

47.80 points

92.96 points

94% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

4274 points

12572 points

194% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4210 points

13872 points

229% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3723 points

13882 points

272% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4072 points

13618 points

234% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3591 points

13257 points

269% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

965 MHz

29% slightly higher core clock speed

747 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

993 MHz

5% slightly higher boost clock speed

937 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

64 Bit

Identical

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

14.4 GB/s

56.06 GB/s

289% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

16 W

25% slightly lower TDP

20 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

7.94 Gigapixels/s

14.99 Gigapixels/s

88% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

23.83 Gigatexels/s

29.98 Gigatexels/s

25% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

256

640

150% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

33% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

422nd of 586

269th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 March

2020 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce 920MX vs GeForce MX350 comparison

For gaming, the GeForce MX350 graphics card is better than the GeForce 920MX in our tests.

In our comparison, the GeForce 920MX has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce 920MX also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the GeForce 920MX has a slightly lower TDP at 16 W when compared to the GeForce MX350 at 20 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce MX350 is faster than the GeForce 920MX.