AMD FX-8320E vs Intel Core i7-4800MQ

Compare AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition 4 core CPU vs Intel 4th Generation Core i7 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 178.02
$ 149.95
$ 28.07 slightly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

2342 points
2395 points
2% slightly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

3438 points
3995 points
16% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

1993 points
3% slightly better multitasking score
1928 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

1917 points
3% slightly better heavy workload score
1851 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the FX-8320E and the Core i7-4800MQ? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

36.00 points
48.93 points
35% slightly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

1615 points
2555 points
58% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score
Geekbench 5 (single) score

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

434 points
914 points
110% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score
Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

1680 points
3174 points
88% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score
Geekbench 6 (single) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

437 points
1063 points
143% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

4
Identical
4

Threads

Number of logical processing units

8
Identical
8

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.2 GHz
18% slightly higher clock speed
2.70 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

4 GHz
8% slightly higher turbo speed
3.7 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

95 W
47 W
102% significantly lower TDP

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

2 MiB
100% significantly more L2 cache
1 MiB

L3 Cache

General memory pool for all cores

8 MiB
33% slightly more L3 cache
6 MiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

651st of 1,089
644th of 1,089

Family

The product line

FX 8-Core Black Edition
4th Generation Core i7

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 September
2013 May

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3
DDR3-1333

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

Yes
-

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

-
No

FX-8320E vs Core i7-4800MQ specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Core i7-4800MQ beats the FX-8320E in overall performance. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the FX-8320E in all gaming tests too.

Our spec comparison shows that they have an identical amount of cores and the same number of threads. With our hardware info, we find that the FX-8320E has a slightly higher clock speed than the Core i7-4800MQ. The Core i7-4800MQ outputs less heat than FX-8320E thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the FX-8320E has significantly more L2 cache than the Core i7-4800MQ. The FX-8320E also has slightly more L3 cache.

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the FX-8320E has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular CPU Comparisons