FX-8320 vs Xeon E5-2630 v2 specs and performance
Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Xeon E5-2630 v2 performs better than the FX-8320. Despite this, the FX-8320 has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.
In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Xeon E5-2630 v2 has significantly more cores than the FX-8320. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2630 v2 has 6 cores compared to 4 cores found in the FX-8320. It also has more threads than the FX-8320. Our comparison shows that the FX-8320 has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2630 v2. Also, the FX-8320 has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Xeon E5-2630 v2 outputs less heat than FX-8320 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.
Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the FX-8320 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.