AMD FX-8320 vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

Compare AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition 4 core CPU vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO Desktop with Radeon Vega Graphics 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

2534 points
0.52% slightly better overall score
2521 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

3698 points
4552 points
23% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

2159 points
11% slightly better multitasking score
1942 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

2072 points
11% slightly better heavy workload score
1863 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the FX-8320 and the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

4
Identical
4

Threads

Number of logical processing units

8
100% significantly more threads
4

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.5 GHz
Identical
3.5 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

4 GHz
8% slightly higher turbo speed
3.7 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

125 W
65 W
92% significantly lower TDP

L1 Cache

Smallest embedded memory, but the fastest

384 KiB
Identical
384 KiB

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

8 MiB
300% significantly more L2 cache
2 MiB

L3 Cache

General memory pool for all cores

8 MiB
100% significantly more L3 cache
4 MiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

620th of 1,089
623rd of 1,089

Family

The product line

FX 8-Core Black Edition
Ryzen 3 PRO Desktop with Radeon Vega Graphics

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

-
2018 May

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3
-

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

Yes
No

FX-8320 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G specs and performance

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G performs better than the FX-8320. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the FX-8320 in all gaming tests too.

Info from our database shows that they both have the same core count but the FX-8320 has more threads. In terms of clock speed, the FX-8320 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G are identical in this regard. Despite this, the FX-8320 has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G outputs less heat than FX-8320 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the FX-8320 has significantly more L2 cache than the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G. The FX-8320 also has significantly more L3 cache.

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the FX-8320 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular CPU Comparisons