FX-8300 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G comparison
According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is faster than the FX-8300. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the FX-8300 in all gaming tests too.
In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G has significantly more cores than the FX-8300. Indeed, the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G has 6 cores compared to 4 cores found in the FX-8300. It also has more threads than the FX-8300. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the FX-8300. In addition, both chips have the same turbo speed. The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outputs less heat than FX-8300 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the FX-8300 has significantly more L2 cache than the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. However, both these chips have the same amount of L3 cache.
Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the FX-8300 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.