FX-8300 vs FX-4100 comparison
Our benchmark analysis concludes that the FX-8300 performs better than the FX-4100. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the FX-4100 in all gaming tests too.
In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the FX-8300 has significantly more cores than the FX-4100. Indeed, the FX-8300 has 4 cores compared to 2 cores found in the FX-4100. It also has more threads than the FX-4100. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the FX-4100 has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the FX-8300. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the FX-8300 has significantly more L2 cache than the FX-4100. However, both these chips have the same amount of L3 cache.
The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the FX-8300 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.