FX-8120 vs Xeon E5-2609 v3 benchmarks
Our benchmark analysis concludes that the FX-8120 performs better than the Xeon E5-2609 v3. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-2609 v3 in all gaming tests too.
In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Xeon E5-2609 v3 has significantly more cores than the FX-8120. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2609 v3 has 6 cores compared to 4 cores found in the FX-8120. Despite this, the FX-8120 has more threads than the Xeon E5-2609 v3. Our comparison shows that the FX-8120 has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2609 v3. The Xeon E5-2609 v3 outputs less heat than FX-8120 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.
Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. Indeed, the FX-8120 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.