FX-6300 vs Xeon E5-620 comparison
In our benchmarks, the Xeon E5-620 beats the FX-6300 in overall performance. Despite this, the FX-6300 has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.
With info from our database, we find that the Xeon E5-620 has slightly more cores with 4 cores whereas the FX-6300 has 3 cores. It also has more threads than the FX-6300. With our hardware info, we find that the FX-6300 has a slightly higher clock speed than the Xeon E5-620. Also, the FX-6300 has a much higher turbo speed. The Xeon E5-620 outputs less heat than FX-6300 thanks to a slightly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. In terms of cache, the FX-6300 has significantly more L2 cache when compared to the Xeon E5-620. The FX-6300 also has significantly more L3 cache.
The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the FX-6300 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.