AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i7-4900MQ

Compare AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition 3 core CPU vs Intel 4th Generation Core i7 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 50.00
$ 150.00 significantly less expensive
$ 200.00

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

1799 points
2307 points
28% slightly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

2999 points
3862 points
28% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

1441 points
1859 points
29% slightly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

1382 points
1784 points
29% slightly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the FX-6300 and the Core i7-4900MQ? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

28.92 points
54.97 points
90% significantly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

1489 points
2842 points
90% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score
Geekbench 5 (single) score

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

472 points
933 points
97% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score
Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

1426 points
3402 points
138% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score
Geekbench 6 (single) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

454 points
1123 points
147% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

3
4
33% slightly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

6
8
33% slightly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.5 GHz
24% slightly higher clock speed
2.80 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.8 GHz
Identical
3.8 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

95 W
47 W
102% significantly lower TDP

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

6 MiB
499% significantly more L2 cache
1 MiB

L3 Cache

General memory pool for all cores

8 MiB
Identical
8 MiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

757th of 1,089
659th of 1,089

Family

The product line

FX 6-Core Black Edition
4th Generation Core i7

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

-
2013 May

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3
DDR3-1333

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

No
-

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

-
No

FX-6300 vs Core i7-4900MQ specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the FX-6300 is faster than the Core i7-4900MQ. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Core i7-4900MQ in all gaming tests too.

When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the Core i7-4900MQ has slightly more cores with 4 cores compared to the FX-6300 that has 3 cores. It also has more threads than the FX-6300. Our comparison shows that the FX-6300 has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Core i7-4900MQ. The info from our database shows that the FX-6300 has more L2 cache than the Core i7-4900MQ. However, both these chips have the same amount of L3 cache.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the FX-6300 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular CPU Comparisons