FX-6100 vs Athlon 3000G specs and performance
Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Athlon 3000G performs better than the FX-6100. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the FX-6100 in all gaming tests too.
With info from our database, we find that the FX-6100 has significantly more cores with 3 cores whereas the Athlon 3000G has 2 cores. It also has more threads than the Athlon 3000G. With our hardware info, we find that the Athlon 3000G has a slightly higher clock speed than the FX-6100. The info from our database shows that the FX-6100 has more L2 cache than the Athlon 3000G. The FX-6100 also has significantly more L3 cache.
The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the FX-6100 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.