AMD FirePro W7100 vs Intel Arc A370M

Compare AMD FirePro W7100 8 GB vs Intel Arc A370M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1150 points

1187 points

3% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

26 FPS

33 FPS

7 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

17 FPS

19 FPS

2 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

22 FPS

2 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

19 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

9 FPS

12 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the FirePro W7100 and the Arc A370M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

24202 points

29812 points

23% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

27600 points

28700 points

3% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

920 MHz

206% significantly higher core clock speed

300 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

300% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

160 GB/s

42% much higher memory bandwidth

112 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

150 W

35 W

328% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

29.44 Gigapixels/s

49.6 Gigapixels/s

68% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

103 Gigatexels/s

3% slightly higher texture rate

99.2 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

3.3 TFLOPS

3% slightly better floating point performance

3.17 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1792

75% significantly more shading units

1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112

75% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

255th of 586

251st of 586

Family

The product line

FirePro

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 August

2022 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.4

4.6

FirePro W7100 vs Arc A370M specs and performance

For gaming, the Arc A370M graphics card is better than the FirePro W7100 in our tests.

Our database shows that the FirePro W7100 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

In addition, the Arc A370M has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the FirePro W7100 at 150 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Arc A370M over the FirePro W7100.