AMD FirePro W2100 vs Intel Iris Xe

Compare AMD FirePro W2100 vs Intel Iris Xe, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

121 points
974 points
704% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

3 FPS
24 FPS
20 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS
14 FPS
13 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

3 FPS
15 FPS
12 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

0 FPS
10 FPS
10 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the FirePro W2100 and the Iris Xe? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4425 points
14184 points
220% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4070 points
11957 points
193% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4497 points
16575 points
268% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

630 MHz
110% significantly higher core clock speed
300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

680 MHz
1100 MHz
61% significantly higher boost clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

26 W
15 W
73% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

5.44 Gigapixels/s
13.2 Gigapixels/s
142% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

13.6 Gigatexels/s
26.4 Gigatexels/s
94% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

320
384
20% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

20
24
20% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

8
12
49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

483rd of 586
266th of 586

Family

The product line

FirePro
-

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 August
2020 September

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3
DDR4

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

FirePro W2100 vs Iris Xe specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Iris Xe beats the FirePro W2100 in gaming performance.

The FirePro W2100 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. Despite this, the Iris Xe has a significantly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Iris Xe has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the FirePro W2100 at 26 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Iris Xe is faster than the FirePro W2100.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons