Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD EPYC 7571

Core Ultra 9 285H vs EPYC 7571 comparison

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Core Ultra 9 285H performs better than the EPYC 7571. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the EPYC 7571 in all gaming tests too.

When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the EPYC 7571 has significantly more cores with 32 cores compared to the Core Ultra 9 285H that has 16 cores. It also has more threads than the Core Ultra 9 285H. With our hardware info, we find that the Core Ultra 9 285H has a slightly higher clock speed than the EPYC 7571. In terms of cache, the Core Ultra 9 285H has significantly more L2 cache when compared to the EPYC 7571. Despite this, the EPYC 7571 has significantly more L3 cache compared to the Core Ultra 9 285H.

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. For instance, the Core Ultra 9 285H has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.