Intel Core i7-9700 vs Intel Xeon E5-2670

Compare Intel 9th Generation Core i7 8 core CPU vs Intel Xeon E5 Family 8 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Intel Xeon E5-2670

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 338.78

$ 152.62 significantly less expensive

$ 491.40

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

5190 points

93% significantly better overall score

2679 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

7573 points

101% significantly better gaming score

3763 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

4403 points

90% significantly better multitasking score

2311 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

4217 points

90% significantly better heavy workload score

2218 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Core i7-9700 and the Xeon E5-2670? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

106.42 points

52% significantly higher Blender score

69.61 points

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

6174 points

99% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score

3089 points

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1526 points

210% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score

491 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

6222 points

103% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

3052 points

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1571 points

211% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

505 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

Identical

Threads

Number of logical processing units

100% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3 GHz

15% slightly higher clock speed

2.6 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

4.7 GHz

42% slightly higher turbo speed

3.3 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

65 W

76% significantly lower TDP

115 W

PCIe Lanes

Number of physical connections between the CPU and expansion slots

150% significantly more pcie lanes

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

100% significantly more memory channels

Supported Memory

Maximum amount of RAM supported by this CPU

128 GiB

384 GiB

200% significantly more supported memory

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

326th of 1,089

596th of 1,089

Family

The product line

9th Generation Core i7

Xeon E5 Family

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 May

2012 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-2666

DDR3-1066

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes

Core i7-9700 vs Xeon E5-2670 benchmarks

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Core i7-9700 performs better than the Xeon E5-2670. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-2670 in all gaming tests too.

Info from our database shows that they both have the same core count but the Xeon E5-2670 has more threads. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the Core i7-9700 has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2670. Also, the Core i7-9700 has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Core i7-9700 CPU outputs less heat than a Xeon E5-2670 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. For instance, the Core i7-9700 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.