Intel Core i7-4600M vs Intel Core i7-4810MQ

Compare Intel 4th Generation Core i7 2 core CPU vs Intel 4th Generation Core i7 3 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

1394 points
1976 points
41% slightly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

2774 points
3270 points
17% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

1034 points
1601 points
54% significantly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

992 points
1538 points
55% significantly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Core i7-4600M and the Core i7-4810MQ? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

30.90 points
48.85 points
58% significantly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

1735 points
3141 points
81% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score
Geekbench 5 (single) score

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

961 points
1012 points
5% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score
Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

1926 points
3224 points
67% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score
Geekbench 6 (single) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1013 points
1110 points
9% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

2
3
49% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

4
5
25% slightly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

2.9 GHz
3% slightly higher clock speed
2.79 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
5% slightly higher turbo speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

37 W
27% slightly lower TDP
47 W

PCIe Lanes

Number of physical connections between the CPU and expansion slots

16
Identical
16

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

2
Identical
2

Supported Memory

Maximum amount of RAM supported by this CPU

32 GiB
Identical
32 GiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

841st of 1,089
724th of 1,089

Family

The product line

4th Generation Core i7
4th Generation Core i7

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 November
2014 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3-1333
DDR3-1333

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

No
No

Core i7-4600M vs Core i7-4810MQ benchmarks

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Core i7-4810MQ performs better than the Core i7-4600M. Despite this, the Core i7-4600M has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.

When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the Core i7-4810MQ has significantly more cores with 3 cores compared to the Core i7-4600M that has 2 cores. It also has more threads than the Core i7-4600M. With our hardware info, we find that the Core i7-4600M has a slightly higher clock speed than the Core i7-4810MQ. Despite this, the Core i7-4810MQ has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Core i7-4600M CPU outputs less heat than a Core i7-4810MQ CPU because of its slightly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Core i7-4600M has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular CPU Comparisons