Intel Core i7-10700 vs Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3

Compare Intel 10th Generation Core i7 8 core CPU vs Intel Xeon E5 v3 Family 8 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 298.15

$ 63.20

$ 234.95 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

6267 points

23% slightly better overall score

5079 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

7929 points

52% significantly better gaming score

5205 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

5718 points

12% slightly better multitasking score

5069 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

5568 points

8% slightly better heavy workload score

5131 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Core i7-10700 and the Xeon E5-2640 v3? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

143.42 points

26% slightly higher Blender score

113.01 points

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

7060 points

34% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score

5241 points

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1560 points

55% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score

1004 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

7115 points

32% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

5384 points

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1625 points

56% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

1040 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

Identical

Threads

Number of logical processing units

Identical

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

2.9 GHz

11% slightly higher clock speed

2.6 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

4.8 GHz

41% slightly higher turbo speed

3.4 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

65 W

38% slightly lower TDP

90 W

PCIe Lanes

Number of physical connections between the CPU and expansion slots

150% significantly more pcie lanes

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

100% significantly more memory channels

Supported Memory

Maximum amount of RAM supported by this CPU

128 GiB

768 GiB

499% significantly more supported memory

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

238th of 1,089

341st of 1,089

Family

The product line

10th Generation Core i7

Xeon E5 v3 Family

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 May

2014 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-2933

DDR4-1600

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes

Core i7-10700 vs Xeon E5-2640 v3 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Core i7-10700 is faster than the Xeon E5-2640 v3. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-2640 v3 in all gaming tests too.

When comparing these CPUs we notice that they have the same number of cores and the same number of threads. With our hardware info, we find that the Core i7-10700 has a slightly higher clock speed than the Xeon E5-2640 v3. Also, the Core i7-10700 has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Core i7-10700 CPU outputs less heat than a Xeon E5-2640 v3 CPU because of its slightly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Core i7-10700 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.