Intel Core i5-9600K vs Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4

Compare Intel 9th Generation Core i5 6 core CPU vs Intel Xeon E5 v4 Family 8 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 159.00

$ 766.00 significantly less expensive

$ 925.00

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

4450 points

4938 points

10% slightly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

7080 points

15% slightly better gaming score

6135 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

3627 points

4537 points

25% slightly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

3488 points

4433 points

27% slightly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Core i5-9600K and the Xeon E5-2667 v4? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

94.07 points

138.59 points

47% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

5629 points

6681 points

18% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1529 points

35% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score

1125 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

6212 points

6682 points

7% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1679 points

43% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

1174 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

33% slightly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

166% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.7 GHz

15% slightly higher clock speed

3.2 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

4.6 GHz

27% slightly higher turbo speed

3.6 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

95 W

42% slightly lower TDP

135 W

PCIe Lanes

Number of physical connections between the CPU and expansion slots

150% significantly more pcie lanes

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

100% significantly more memory channels

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

394th of 1,089

354th of 1,089

Family

The product line

9th Generation Core i5

Xeon E5 v4 Family

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2018 November

2016 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-2666

DDR4-1600

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

Yes

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes

Core i5-9600K vs Xeon E5-2667 v4 specs and performance

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Xeon E5-2667 v4 performs better than the Core i5-9600K. Despite this, the Core i5-9600K has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.

With info from our database, we find that the Xeon E5-2667 v4 has slightly more cores with 8 cores whereas the Core i5-9600K has 6 cores. It also has more threads than the Core i5-9600K. Our comparison shows that the Core i5-9600K has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2667 v4. Also, the Core i5-9600K has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Core i5-9600K CPU outputs less heat than a Xeon E5-2667 v4 CPU because of its slightly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. For instance, the Core i5-9600K has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.