Intel Core i5-7400 vs Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2

Compare Intel 7th Generation Core i5 4 core CPU vs Intel Xeon E5 v2 Family 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 59.00

$ 30.00

$ 29.00 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

2237 points

2286 points

2% slightly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

4164 points

15% slightly better gaming score

3603 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

1701 points

1895 points

11% slightly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

1632 points

1822 points

11% slightly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Core i5-7400 and the Xeon E5-1620 v2? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

43.28 points

49.31 points

13% slightly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

3137 points

36% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (multi) score

2305 points

Geekbench 5 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1144 points

80% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (single) score

633 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

3282 points

37% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

2380 points

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1193 points

84% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

645 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

Identical

Threads

Number of logical processing units

100% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3 GHz

3.7 GHz

23% slightly higher clock speed

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.5 GHz

3.9 GHz

11% slightly higher turbo speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

65 W

100% significantly lower TDP

130 W

PCIe Lanes

Number of physical connections between the CPU and expansion slots

150% significantly more pcie lanes

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

100% significantly more memory channels

Supported Memory

Maximum amount of RAM supported by this CPU

64 GiB

256 GiB

300% significantly more supported memory

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

675th of 1,089

665th of 1,089

Family

The product line

7th Generation Core i5

Xeon E5 v2 Family

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 February

2013 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-2133

DDR3-1066

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes

Core i5-7400 vs Xeon E5-1620 v2 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 is faster than the Core i5-7400. Despite this, the Core i5-7400 has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.

Our spec comparison shows that they have an identical amount of cores but the Xeon E5-1620 v2 has more threads. With our hardware info, we find that the Xeon E5-1620 v2 has a slightly higher clock speed than the Core i5-7400. Also, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Core i5-7400 CPU outputs less heat than a Xeon E5-1620 v2 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. For instance, the Core i5-7400 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.