Core i3-8109U vs Celeron N5095A benchmarks
Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Core i3-8109U performs better than the Celeron N5095A. Despite this, the Celeron N5095A has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.
When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the Celeron N5095A has significantly more cores with 4 cores compared to the Core i3-8109U that has 2 cores. But they both have the same number of threads. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the Core i3-8109U has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Celeron N5095A. In terms of cache, the Celeron N5095A has significantly more L2 cache when compared to the Core i3-8109U. However, both these chips have the same amount of L3 cache.
The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Core i3-8109U has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.