Intel Core i3-10110U vs AMD FX-8320

Core i3-10110U vs FX-8320 comparison

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the FX-8320 performs better than the Core i3-10110U. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Core i3-10110U in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the FX-8320 has significantly more cores than the Core i3-10110U. Indeed, the FX-8320 has 4 cores compared to 2 cores found in the Core i3-10110U. It also has more threads than the Core i3-10110U. With our hardware info, we find that the FX-8320 has a significantly higher clock speed than the Core i3-10110U. A Core i3-10110U CPU outputs less heat than a FX-8320 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. In terms of cache, the FX-8320 has significantly more L2 cache when compared to the Core i3-10110U. The FX-8320 also has significantly more L3 cache.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Core i3-10110U has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.