Intel Core i3-10110U vs AMD FX-6300

Core i3-10110U vs FX-6300 comparison

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the FX-6300 performs better than the Core i3-10110U. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Core i3-10110U in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the FX-6300 has significantly more cores than the Core i3-10110U. Indeed, the FX-6300 has 3 cores compared to 2 cores found in the Core i3-10110U. It also has more threads than the Core i3-10110U. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the FX-6300 has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Core i3-10110U. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the FX-6300 has significantly more L2 cache than the Core i3-10110U. The FX-6300 also has significantly more L3 cache.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Core i3-10110U has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.