Core i3-10110U vs FX-4300 specs and performance
Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Core i3-10110U performs better than the FX-4300. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the FX-4300 in all gaming tests too.
Info from our database shows that they both have the same core count and the same number of threads. Our comparison shows that the FX-4300 has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Core i3-10110U. A Core i3-10110U CPU outputs less heat than a FX-4300 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. In terms of cache, the FX-4300 has significantly more L2 cache when compared to the Core i3-10110U. However, both these chips have the same amount of L3 cache.
Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Core i3-10110U has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.