Intel Core i3-10105F vs Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3

Core i3-10105F vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 comparison

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Core i3-10105F performs better than the Xeon E5-2620 v3. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-2620 v3 in all gaming tests too.

When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the Xeon E5-2620 v3 has significantly more cores with 6 cores compared to the Core i3-10105F that has 4 cores. It also has more threads than the Core i3-10105F. Our comparison shows that the Core i3-10105F has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon E5-2620 v3. Also, the Core i3-10105F has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Core i3-10105F CPU outputs less heat than a Xeon E5-2620 v3 CPU because of its slightly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Core i3-10105F has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.