Intel Core i3-10105F vs AMD EPYC 7543P

Core i3-10105F vs EPYC 7543P specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Core i3-10105F beats the EPYC 7543P in overall performance. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the EPYC 7543P in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the EPYC 7543P has significantly more cores than the Core i3-10105F. Indeed, the EPYC 7543P has 32 cores compared to 4 cores found in the Core i3-10105F. It also has more threads than the Core i3-10105F. With our hardware info, we find that the Core i3-10105F has a slightly higher clock speed than the EPYC 7543P. Also, the Core i3-10105F has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Core i3-10105F CPU outputs less heat than a EPYC 7543P CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Core i3-10105F has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.